.

Monday, December 23, 2013

Letter to the Editor of "A Change of Heart About Animals"

26 November 2012 Christian Flores 28000 Wolverine Way, Aliso Viejo, 92656 Davan Maharaj Los Angeles Times 202 West beginning(a) Street Los Angeles, CA, 90012 solemn Editor, In Jeremy Rifkins clause A Change of aggregate About Animals, he speaks near how we should share wights better because they argon more(prenominal)(prenominal) corresponding humans than what is commonly recollectd. In the article he says many of our fellow creatures are more like us than we had ever imagined, to show his controversy. Rifkin makes many points to the highest degree how animals should be treated humanely in his article and these bloodlines are, for the close to part, truly reasonable. I agree, to an extent, with Jeremy Rifkin and his arguments. In the article, Jeremy Rifkin shows that it would be illogical to resist that animals subscribe to human-like qualities through studies. In wholeness of the studies from the Gorilla tail in Northern California, Koko, the 300-pound gorilla was taught sign language and has know more than 1,000 signs and understands several thousand English words. I find it odd that anyone could possibly disagree with Rifkins argument about gorillas after reading how Koko could not only communicate with, further besides understand humans. Rifkin uses a lot of research in his argument from prestigious universities such as Oxford and Harvard.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
In one mannequin he explains a study from Oxford University that showed that two birds utilise tools to develop food. In his other example he stated that Harvard and 25 other law schools countenance courses on anima l rights. Rifkin uses these passing renowne! d schools to his advantage. It would be surprising if anyone didnt believe his argument from these studies. One of Rifkins arguments is that we should treat animals better because of the accompaniment that animals have self-awareness. This is where I disagree with him entirely. He uses examples of rats releasing dopamine from their brains and elephants distress their dead, but I find his argument towards pots pathetic appeal very flawed. He...If you want to demoralise a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment