.

Thursday, January 24, 2019

Cultural Schock

Sabrina Monforte Essay 2 Critical analysis To w get into extend be you convinced by Tanges (2005) position regarding ethnical reading? Regarding the issuance of cultural adaptation there are many theories. This essay, essenti in ally, will dissect in depth the opinion of a Professor in the discussion section of Language and Business communication Hanne Tange , whos major is inside the field of Intercultural communication, in opposite cultural and horrify adaptation proposed by Sverre Lysgaard in 1995. At for the first time, Tange illustrates in her article In a cultural No troopss arena or, how long does ulture shock last? the meaning of sojourn, a key word in her study, to understand that it represents a short freeze in a nonher country, usually mingled with a touch of months and a few years, to conduct an international project or a world(a) work in order to expanded the companys get over the world, in order to solve a greater fortunate income for it. However, c ultural shock has not been analysed from both sides, Tanges and Lysgaard, beca implement of the fact that Tanges has been as well as prevail overive by taking in consideration this theme. So that, I gutter not be extended to one of those theories.Anyway, allows introduce the argument by saying that cultural adaptation is relevant to employees to gain the maximum result from their tasks. During their stay, in the host country, so that they can acquire international competence to benefit their enterprises. According to Tange, to gain the best from a sojourn it is important that also the company should be involved in all the process of adaptation, by following the sojourn, and not to leave the employee on his own. So that the gain of high international suitable skills, can be elaborated as resources for international line of descent.But span introduces the comment of another(prenominal) author by saying that, the process of acculturation rarely moves beyond the level of on sto rey culture (Varner and Beamer 2005 3), which starts during the process of involvement at the beginning in their own country and it ends there. However, to support the conception of cultural adaptation beyond their own national borders, there are two quite distinct approaches Lysgasrds and Tanges homunculus. According to Lysgards model which is related to the 50s, cultural adaptation follows a U spurt curve. Indeed, at the beginning of the stage, adjustment is felt o be indulgent than follows a crisis in which one feels less well adjusted, somewhat lonesome and unhappy finally one begins to feel better adjusted again, turn more integrated into the foreign community ( Lysgaard cited in Tange, 2005). To arrive at this explanation, one opinion has been conducted by analysing Norwegians visitingThe United States of America. On the other hand, against the former theory, we have Tange who states that cross cultural adaptation is divided in tierce steps arrival, two years crisis, intercultural stage. In this case, the finding into the research of intercultural business communication benefit rom a qualitative method exploitation in the anthropology and ethnology ( Tangle, 2005). Furthermore, to make this survey more reliable, she has taken seven community which they had to move from Scotland to Denmark, aged between 25 and 44 years old, and she has assessed the interviewees by dint of an informal dialogue. Due to this originator it is hardly to think that her methodology can be thought reliable, because of the lowest number of interviewees. It is reasonable to distinguish between the concept of sojourners and immigrants (Tangle, 2005).Tangle refers to Stella Ting-Toomey to explain that the main differences are more ased on a intercultural encounter rather then the natural assure of itself. This is due to the reason of a different point of view. Immigrants are more apparent to be stressed and this lead to an expectation of a permanent residence, which ca n be obtained by the Government only by following some tired roules, for instance, having a permanent job, staying in the same country for a couple of years without leaving it, receiving a good income. On the other hand, sojourners are also stressed however, they do not need to stay for all their life in the host country, ut the duration of the residence it is subject to the contract with their own company. Anyway they can feel anxious in the second stage, according to Tangles method, as a reaction of being far away from their country, and this is equivalent to homesickness, and more in level means missing family, friends, their own culture -. In addition to that consequence, they experience also mild identity dislocation, disorientation and loneliness ( Ting-Toomey 1999 248). Although this is the second stage, the first one and the last one are quite similar to each other from the panorama of feelings.The interviewees describeed an exited and relaxed attitude. It seems that t he arrival stage consists of cultural assimilation, which refers to new exiting friendly networks, thus they feel emotionally charged up and curious active the new culture. While the third stage is blurred for the interviewees, because under this stage everything is absorbed at the subconscious level and are unlikely to show in a quantitative survey. But we can state that as they gain an inside perspective on their new culture, the frustration great power be tail-off but for someone is totally erased.For example, upon their return to the home country, they competency find deviation between their own natural behaviour and their behavioural patterns, and it is unlikely to settle into their old way. In outlining the result from the survey, we can highlighting the fact that most of the employees have been sent home, when they had the right feeling to use their intercultural skills to benefit their enterprise. According to Tanges, it is mainly advisable to extend sojourns over trin e years to strengthen the companys position in a particular market abroad.At the opposite side, Tange suggests that Lysgaaeds model of the culture shock is not clear and fails to account for cultural overlapping. Whereas she sustains Tangle model is found on a simplified version of reality (Tangle, 2005). However that may be, dare I say that even if Tangle is approaching to the guinea pig using a qualitative method, which is useful to measure something compared to real-life situation, the weakness aspect is that the interviewees analysed are concentrated. Thereof, we can add that the way putting the article is too subjective and she did not nalyse in depth Lysgaard model. In conclusion, notwithstanding what Tangle thinks about Lysgaard strategy, it could be also valuable if analysed.By evaluating the article, the strength is the duration of the survey taken from the employees settled down in the host country, and moreover it is compose in an understandable way for a general audi ence, even if it qualification be written for big companies with subsidiaries branches. Tangle gained her aim by unite theories of sojourner adaptation with qualitative results but without countering her arguments. In fact, it is reasonable to imagine hat the article and the survey are clashing. Taking over that, I would suggest, HR of big companies have to invest in personnel development for a cultural overview, to prepare them and push trough the stationing overseas in a reasonable way. Thereof, it is relevant that during the training and the sojourn, all the employees are accompanied by their partners, who can help them settle into their new place and to let them lining what they are going to expect. An also, HR have to send employees in another country within their same cultural region, so that they are likely to feel more relaxed.Tangle survey could be hold in a different way by taking also other resources. 1200 quarrel References Lysgaard S. , 1995. Adjustment in a foreig n society Norwegian Fulbright Grantees tour The United States in International Social Science Bulletin 7 45-51. Tange H. , 2005, In a cultural No Mans Land or, how long does culture shock last? , Journal of Intercultural communication, issue 10. Ting-Tomey S. , 1999. Communication Across Cultures. New York The Guliford Press. Varner, I. and L. Beamer, 2005. Intercultural Communication in the Global Workplace. 3rd ed. capital of Massachusetts McGraw-Hill.

No comments:

Post a Comment