Endorsement of the Reproductive Health Bill as a Law Essay

The The amenable P arnthood, Reproductive Health and Population and Development Act of 2011 or patently the RH bill, has been a very controversial topic for the past decade. nary(prenominal) a few disagreements came between Malacaang and the Catholic Church. The later making each step of the acts approval a hard unity. Whose side should we support? at that place atomic number 18 several points in the Reproductive Health distinction that should be reconsidered. The third guiding principle which states that since human resource is among the principal asset of the country, maternal thoroughlyness, safe delivery of healthy children and their full human in takeation and responsible parenting must be ensured through effective reproductive health care, is being challenged by the bills Section 11 Procurement and Distribution of Family Planning Supplies. The phrase full human learning result be put in jeopardy because some of the items that will be distributed are non good for t he development of the first stages of life. unity of its functions is kill the fertilized egg a stage where life started which is no residuum to aborting an infant, or killing an adult. In addition, the fifth guiding principle states that the stir shall recruit, without bias, all effective natural and modern methods of family planning that are medically safe and legal the supplies would all be legal, safe for the mothers but by all odds dangerous for their babies. Another hole to this Section (11) is the funds to be used. kinda of using the nations money on items for killing the initiation of infants the government could use it on to a greater extent reasonable projects project that force second the poor, develop the services offered, or stop corruption perhaps. The amend last phrase of Section16 Mandatory Age-Appropriate Reproductive Health and Sexuality facts of life states that Age-appropriate Reproductive Health and Sexuality Education shall be integrated in all re levant subjects but the section says that this kind of education is mandatory, at once a hold violating its own principle for freedom of choice. The Section 20 angel Family Size opposes the first guiding principle of the act. Section 3 no. 11 talks about freedom of choice, a matter not considered in the making of the 20th section.On the other hand, there are also good points to consider in the act. Sections 5 and 6 promote the protection of the health & lives of mothers and saving babies undergoing dangerous delivery, support and deploy more public midwives, nurses and doctors. The Bill also responds to those who want smaller families, in the form of promoting various family planning methods and at the same time it helps prevent generate abortions. It also guarantees funding for & equal access to health facilities. Section 15 Mobile Health Care Service promotes the medical services in the mountainous areas in the country it would be such a help to the indigenous people who cann ot reach the aid of medical facilities in their town. in that location are pros and cons to be considered in the endorsement of the Reproductive Health Bill as a law. There may be more pros we could gain through it but there is one con that should be well thought-out first and foremost, that is the use of substances to destroy a natural growth the process of reproduction. By making this bill a legal law we are violating the law of nature, as well as the Gods. No one was given the right to kill anybody. There are many ways to avoid unwanted pregnancy without consciously or unconsciously killing a life from developing, we should implement that instead and with it all we need is chink and responsibility to make the Philippines a burst country and its people better citizens.